And the clock ticks down....
Jan. 15th, 2015 10:40 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
For the Athena's Daughters 2 Kickstarter. It's been really interesting watching from a distance how it works. (The video, for starters! Amazing!)
And only a week or so back I was reading an essay by
sartorias about how she and
rachelmanija went the self-publishing route for their latest book, Hostage, and the reasons for a shift from publishing through the big companies.
It occurred to me that what's going on is actually a rolling back of a publishing model which began more or less with the Industrial Revolution. Before that (very open to correction on this - this is idle thought, not actual research speaking!) poets and theorists self-published slim pamphlets, or else publishers asked for a list of subscribers before they'd take a risk on setting up larger books, or else writers could find one major patron (who then might renege on the deal, as in described in Samuel Johnson's famous letter to Lord Chesterfield ) but then, round about Jane Austen, authors found themselves not waiting on subscribers or patrons, but on approval from publishers, before the works hit the presses.
I guess it was to do with technology? As printing presses became larger, the industry became more capital-intensive, and the decisions were made more deliberately in terms of the return on capital alone, by those whose capital was tied up in the presses? Wiser insights gladly welcomed.
*I tried to make the links using <username= >, but it didn't work. :( Insights welcomed there, too, as to what I'm doing wrong.
late addition: thanks to wise advice over on LJ, I have now conquered how to do neat links, though I still don't exactly know what I'm doing.
And only a week or so back I was reading an essay by
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It occurred to me that what's going on is actually a rolling back of a publishing model which began more or less with the Industrial Revolution. Before that (very open to correction on this - this is idle thought, not actual research speaking!) poets and theorists self-published slim pamphlets, or else publishers asked for a list of subscribers before they'd take a risk on setting up larger books, or else writers could find one major patron (who then might renege on the deal, as in described in Samuel Johnson's famous letter to Lord Chesterfield ) but then, round about Jane Austen, authors found themselves not waiting on subscribers or patrons, but on approval from publishers, before the works hit the presses.
I guess it was to do with technology? As printing presses became larger, the industry became more capital-intensive, and the decisions were made more deliberately in terms of the return on capital alone, by those whose capital was tied up in the presses? Wiser insights gladly welcomed.
*I tried to make the links using <username= >, but it didn't work. :( Insights welcomed there, too, as to what I'm doing wrong.
late addition: thanks to wise advice over on LJ, I have now conquered how to do neat links, though I still don't exactly know what I'm doing.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 01:15 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 05:10 am (UTC)The tricky part about the 50 Shades model is the second step, though, isn't it? get zillions of readers. :( (And again, :( )
But the self-publishing part - did she do it as an e-publication, or on paper? And the part about the paywall - was this while it was still being published chapter by chapter, or after it (the first book) was finished, but as people wanted to read it a second time, or as their interest was piqued by word of mouth?
no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 01:33 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 01:48 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 01:42 am (UTC)Also, if the person is on another site, you can do <user name="namegoeshere" site="site.com"> -- again, the spaces are important, and you'd use .com or .org or whatever the actual address of the site in question is. No www is necessary. (This won't work for all sites, but I know LJ, Tumblr, AO3, Twitter, and probably also Facebook and Deviantart are supported that way. There may be a FAQ somewhere with a complete list.)
no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 01:49 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 01:54 am (UTC)It's working for me, so... are you using rich text or basic html as your posting interface? That might have something to do with it.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 02:18 am (UTC)I think you may have provided the clue,though. Maybe if I'd started in html, not in rich text?
no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 03:01 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 05:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 02:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-15 02:44 am (UTC)I wonder if it's to do with tighter controls of the press, too, with the Restoration, and pamphleteers getting their ears clipped and so on. (Now not only talking through my hat, but I haven't even got a hat!
no subject
Date: 2015-01-18 12:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-18 02:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2015-01-24 10:30 am (UTC)When ever I'm not sure about the DW and LJ codes for links, I've found this page which lists the codes to be a very useful reference.
no subject
Date: 2015-01-26 12:03 am (UTC)