Narnian headcanon week, 6

[heliopausa]

Oh my!  running late(ish).  But all sorts of things have been happening today (all good).

Sixth in the series:

 

King Lune was once Prince Lewin – he had an older brother, the heir apparent, Prince Lew, who was lost at sea.  In the Archenlandish way, this tragedy (this particular kind, of a complete and mysterious disappearance) was not referred to again, after one year's full mourning. 
In the same way, the loss of Prince Cor was not mentioned after the end of the mourning period; hence Corin himself had never heard of his brother, nor had the younger members of Lune's court, nor the Narnians (who had been still caught in Jadis's Winter when it happened).  For this reason, Lucy and Edmund and Corin don't any of them, on seeing the brothers together, draw the conclusion which would have been obvious, had they known the story. 

“Why, so he is your double,” exclaimed Queen Lucy. “As like as two twins. This is a marvelous thing.”

When Lune speaks to his two sons about kingship, he is doing so remembering, and even repeating, partly, the same words used by his own father to him, the bitter night they accepted that Prince Lew was lost forever.  (Hence, by the way, his use in this passage of the archaic forms he does not usually adopt.)

Comments

Re: head-canon collision

[heliopausa]

Absolutely! He's arrogant and VI-O-LENT! (As you've pointed out, and in his terrible dealing with Drinian in TSC.) Which I think is great, in that it shows Lewis (in the later books at least) was creating a character who's not perfect, far from perfect, but still a protagonist.
And surely creating him such deliberately, partly on the model of the complex, morally questionable characters in the Arthurian cycle and the chansons de geste - lots of precedent there for this sort of thing.

Re: head-canon collision

[transposable_element]

And PC inevitably makes me think of Hamlet, another flawed protagonist, although from what I know of C.S. Lewis I doubt it was his intention to make that parallel. I think it's interesting that he doesn't allow either Caspian or Peter to kill Miraz. It's certainly not due to a squeamishness about the idea of the boy kings killing men in battle, because Peter lops off somebody's head immediately after Miraz is treacherously killed.

I have a theory that he didn't know what to do with the adult Peter because he'd made him Too Good. Even Lucy is allowed some flaws.

Re: head-canon collision

[heliopausa]

Sorry for the delay in replying here.
And... Hamlet. :) I don't suppose Lewis was trying precisely to draw a parallel in Prince Caspian but I'm guessing that he was well aware - not so much of echoes, but of what might later echo for his presumed child audience. He is explicit about the resemblance of Rilian to Hamlet in TSC (where there's also echoes of madness, of course).

What you say about Peter is a lovely thought-starter! I disagree (but that's three-quarters of the fun of such exchanges, isn't it?) that Lewis didn't know what to do with him, but I agree that he set himself a very hard task, (now in the hands of the fanficcers!) in setting up an adult male character defined very largely by straightforward goodness and valour.

Re: head-canon collision

[transposable_element]

I'd forgotten that he describes Rilian as looking like Hamlet, all in black!

The main reason I say that about C.S. Lewis not knowing what to do with the adult Peter is that Peter is the only one of the Pevensies who doesn't appear on stage in HHB. It's possible that the plot just doesn't require him, especially since Edmund is there to take on on the heroic warrior role, which does make for better continuity with the first half of the book, but I tend to think there's more to it than that. And then in TLB Peter comes across to me as very flat and generically noble. Many of the characters are pretty flat in that book, but Lucy starts seeming a lot more like Lucy when they get to the episode with the Dwarfs refusing to be taken in. Possibly I'm also influenced by the Baynes illustration of Tirian peeking through the stable door with Peter standing nearby looking like Superman. (I think a lot of my visual ideas about Narnia come from Baynes, which is why I cannot see Peter as blond! Of course she also draws Lucy with dark hair, in direct contradiction to her description in the books, so I'm not sure why I take Peter's dark hair as canonical.)

I've done some rather awful things to Peter in my own fanfic, the worst one being to place him at the liberation of Bergen-Belsen. I'm not sure why, except that I always feel the impulse to shake him up somehow.

Re: head-canon collision

[autumnia]

Finally, someone else who sees Peter as dark-haired. Like you, my visual cues have been taken with Baynes' illustrations (so for me, Peter is dark, Edmund is blond) though of course, there is the issue of Lucy. But having Lewis be more description with the the girls, it's easier for me to move past the point where she is drawn with dark hair sometimes while others, she is blond (in the Friends of Narnia illustration in TLB for example).

Re: head-canon collision

[transposable_element]

I've always taken a lot of cues from the Baynes illustrations because C.S. Lewis rarely gives detailed physical descriptions of his characters. But I have read that he wasn't happy with many of her illustrations, especially early on in the series.

Re: head-canon collision

[heliopausa]

The PaulineBaynes illustrations were enormously important for me as a child - and so for sure they've stayed as important influences. But we're running into the same squashed-up-layout difficulty. If I open a thread on the NFFR site, could we talk more about them there? (http://www.narniafanfiction.net/forums/index.php)